八卦记(jì )者Marcello原本的(de )志向(⤵)是(🧘)要(yà(🔶)o )成为一名(míng )作家，却(🐺)(què(💐) )因为新(xīn )闻(wén )工(gō(🍼)ng )作关(🍙)(guā(🏞)n )系(xì )，常穿(chuān )梭(suō )在(👣)政商(📸)名(📙)(míng )流之间，过着堕落(🚮)(luò )且糜(🏬)烂的(de )生活。一(yī )日，他和(hé )一(✔)位(🥄)美丽(lì )女子共渡(dù )春宵(🔠)后(🍠)，回家(🤛)发现女友为他吞药(🏳)自(🆖)杀身亡，Marcello的悲伤没有(🍗)太久(💈)，因(🚮)为他又赶着到机场(➕)迎接影(🏩)星Sylvia到来，而接下来的几天，他(🥥)们必需(xū )要作贴身(shēn )采访(📈)…(😬)
During the Baekje period, the Silla Kingdom, another country in Korean peninsular, was watching for an opportunity to unify the two regions. In the royal court of Baekje, with the destiny of its country already in decline, the royal family and its subjects passed their time singing and dancing. When the Silla army invades Baekje, loyal subjects like general Gye-Baek fight with all their might to protect the country. King Uija of Baekje tries to find a way to save the castle, but ultimately fails. Over three thousand court ladies who would rather die than be put to shame run to Nakhwa Rock and throw themselves into the waters of the Baengma River below.
哥(gē(🛂) )特式风格(gé )故事，背(📅)(bè(🔸)i )景设定在(zài )1880的伦敦(🖱)，男爵(🔃)在(🎵)(zài )挖(wā )坟埋在(zài )父(💀)(fù )亲(qī(💥)n )之时(shí )偶(ǒu )然的找(🌸)回(huí )了(🥙)遗留在(zài )他父亲口(kǒu )袋的(🚋)中(🔚)奖(jiǎng )彩票，随(suí )后他脸上(🛏)(shà(💸)ng )露出了诡(guǐ )异的笑容(ró(📵)ng )。影(✔)片的(de )广告噱，”Punishment Poll（惩罚(🌽)投票(🚀)）(🤜)“，当影片情节进行到(🎸)高潮部(🤾)分时， 导演Castle突然出现在荧幕(💁)上给观众解释如何行使自(📜)(zì(🍏) )己的(🧝)投票(piào )权。每一(yī )位(⏩)观(😖)众手(shǒu )里拿到了(le )一(♑)张印(📠)有(🔹)(yǒu )拇指的卡(kǎ )片，他(💚)们(men )可以(🎴)任(rèn )一(yī )做出上(shà(🐦)ng )或(huò )下(♊)(xià )的方(fāng )向(xiàng )以决定Mr. Sardonicus在(zà(🥂)i )影(📌)片结尾(wěi )是复活还(hái )是(💕)死(🥤)亡？据不完全(quán )统计，基(👗)(jī(🥫) )本上没有(yǒu )一位观(🍖)众(zhò(🍉)ng )不(👳)是希望(wàng )电影中反(📄)叛得到(🌦)应有的报应。
1850德州牧场扎克(🚛)立家族來了一位流浪汉称(🎯)扎(💣)克立(🤣)家女儿是印第安凯(🚬)欧(🍁)族孤儿，引(yǐn )起凯欧(🅿)族(zú(📮) )来(👒)此要人(rén )，整個问(wè(🎁)n )题是因(📓)为(wéi )上一代白(bái )人(🚴)与印第(💒)(dì )安相互寻(xún )仇，白(bái )人(ré(➖)n )抱(⛽)走印(yìn )第(dì )安(ān )婴儿(é(🌆)r )回(🕧)(huí )家(jiā )抚养，而该流浪(là(👳)ng )客(🌁)的儿子(zǐ )亦被印第(🍸)(dì )安(🥗)人(😍)掳走(zǒu )，向扎克(kè )立(🔥)家族要(🦔)(yào )求以女婴(yīng )交换其儿(é(🥑)r )子被拒而遭杀害，使其四处(🍍)追(⏸)踪迫(⛅)害，最后水落石出，引(🧘)起(🔙)白人和印第安人的(♑)交战(⏭)
光(😱)源氏はモテモテと(🔏)、平(pí(🔸)ng )安時代から決まっ(🦍)ていま(🦖)す。
Three Post Office employees are at work when the facility is held up. The robber kills the supervisor and knocks out another employee. The third one offers no resistance and survives unscathed. Afterwards he begins to wonder if his refusal to resist was a prudent move to preserve his family, or an act of cowardice, as many in the town believe. The resulting conflict begins to tear apart his family.
Sorry but despite the fact that the 1931 version of this novel was the only western film to win an Academy Award for Best Picture it does not compare to the entertainment value of this version. True this is perhaps not the best adaptation of Ms. Ferber's novel, but then how many films are perfect adaptations of their source material. There are wonderful scenes missing from this adaptation, but then there are wonderful scenes missing from the adaptation of GWTW. No, I am not comparing this to a classic like GWTW. But the '31 version is not in the same class as GWTW either. This film should be taken for what it actually is, a good solid epic entertainment with spectacular scenes and good performances. Glenn Ford is perfect casting for Yancy. His performance is far superior to that of the overripe, stilted scenery chewing one delivered by Richard Dix in the original. Ford's boyish manner easily captures the charming immature nature of the character. Maria Schell is on a par with Irene Dunne. It is a pity her character was rewritten from the novel to be weaker than Ferber intended. This was obviously done to make the film Ford's but she's still gives a performance that is on the money. As so do the myriad supporting players in the film. Back in 1960, MGM obviously needed a big movie to move into the theaters that had been playing "Ben-Hur" for over a year. So this production was rushed to completion to fit the bill. The fact that it was shot in Cinemascope instead of a "Big" 70 mm process is evidence of this. It has been written that the production was shut down before the scripted ending could be filmed. This explains the rather abrupt and somewhat awkward end to the film. Perhaps a regular non "Roadshow" release might have fared better both with the critics and at the box-office. It often seems that those who praise the older version over this film have seldom actually seen the former. For many years the 1931 version was not available for viewing. During that period many film historians gushed in their praise of it. When it finally reappeared on screens most of them found it very creaky and revised their opinions but the older opinions are still in print, available and read. True, they didn't change their opinion of this version, but the older fell into proper perspective...Cinema History and rather dry history at that. While this version is not a classic it remains good entertainment. Compare it to "How The West Was Won" made by the same studio just a few years later.