海洋天堂

On leave in a shore side town, Johnny becomes interested in a young dark haired woman. They meet and he learns that she plays a mermaid in the local carnival. After strange occurrences, Johnny begins to believe that she may actually be a real mermaid that habitually kills during the cycle of the full moon. An ice-skating Snow White finds refuge from the Wicked Queen with the Three Stooges 富(🕧)商魏克家溺爱孙(🎊)女宝(🗿)(bǎo )宝(bǎo )，却冷(😷)待侄(🦓)儿九少。九恐失(shī(🚠) )去家产继承权，与(👉)妻密谋以(yǐ )毒(dú(🛩) )饼杀害宝宝不果(🧢)，遂再趁(chèn )家(jiā )携(🍼)宝宝乘船往巡视(🐓)业务时，买通船家(😣)谋害祖孙二人。小(🤬)(xiǎo )船(chuán )爆炸，家、(🖐)宝宝及时跳海(hǎ(🦅)i )逃(táo )生，漂流至荒(🚐)岛。宝(🧑)宝遇(yù )上(shà(🏃)ng )猩猩(🐁)王，将其驯服，并得(🕐)其(qí )协助在岛上(⌛)生活。家利用酒(jiǔ(⬅) )瓶(píng )发放求救信(🚢)息；(♐)九得知家(jiā(💍) )、宝(💼)宝未死，即与妻及(⏫)同党赶(gǎn )往荒岛(🐬)追杀二人，幸姑婆(🧞)及(jí )时(shí )报警，家(🎴)获救，九等人终(zhō(🐂)ng )被(bèi )绳之以法。 讲(🌄)述二战后在纽(niǔ(🔨) )伦堡提审德国纳(🐜)粹计划的法(fǎ )律(🦓)关系者，三个被告(🚖)提审的(de )原(yuán )因是(📰)给犹(🍜)太人施行断(🚙)种手(🦀)(shǒu )术(shù )。担任主审(🕠)判长的是美国人(📸)(rén )赫鲁特，他主张(🎈)其中两个被(bèi )告(🔲)(gào )无(🐈)罪；而德国(🚈)司法(💿)部长亚(yà )林(lín )克(⚾)竟对此事保持沉(🎆)默，但检(jiǎn )查官罗(🏯)森上校却激烈的(🌖)指责(zé )被(bèi )告，因(🛂)此三个人展开激(🛀)烈(liè )的(de )辩论。审讯(📴)继续进行下去。而(🕕)美国的高级官员(📐)们希望能(néng )在审(🎈)判中获提德国所(😷)犯罪(🗓)行(háng )的(de )良好(🆘)证明(🐨)，因此对审判施(shī(😒) )以(yǐ )极大的压力(👫)，但赫鲁特坚守(shǒ(🦋)u )法律的正义立场(🍋)，给予(🔚)了最(zuì )公(gō(💭)ng )正的(🐪)判决。在宣布判决(🍛)结(jié )果(guǒ )时，只有(😒)亚林对赫鲁特审(💏)判(pàn )长的态度表(📟)示赞赏。 美国海(hǎ(🚸)i )军(jun1 )上校尼尔逊（(💶)沃尔特皮金(jīn )饰(🖲)(shì )）领导潜艇海(👌)景号在北极下(xià(👴) )探测时，地球突生(🐗)危机，大(dà )气层被(🐶)一股(🍄)大火燃烧，令(🍦)地(dì(🎰) )球(qiú )极速升温，地(🎼)球上干旱无(wú )雨(🆑)(yǔ )，顿诚人间炼狱(🏪)。科学家主(zhǔ )张纷(🗾)歧，尼(🐛)尔逊决定由海景(🐕)(jǐng )号(hào )发射核子(🏢)飞弹，让其在大(dà(⤴) )气(qì )层外爆炸以(🍪)期熄灭大火，令(lì(🚇)ng )地球降温。为求能(📟)够快速解(jiě )决(jué(📹) )这个问题，尼尔逊(🚺)毅然由(yóu )船(chuán )员(✳)自愿选择是留在(📝)船上还是(shì )继续(💗)前进，但是在全世(🔣)界都(🚮)(dōu )没有办法的情(👹)况下，只有听(tīng )命(➿)(mìng )于尼尔逊的这(🌲)个计划了…… 永(⛷)井荷風の没後一(🎮)周年(😞)を記(jì )念して、(🙉)豊田四郎監督が(😲)同(tóng )名(míng )小説を(🏒)映画化した文芸(🐯)作(zuò )。東京の郊外(😥)、隅田川の東に(🕢)ある遊廓で中学(👫)教師・順平(píng )は(😑)、お雪という娼(🎂)婦と出会(huì )い恋(🔃)に落ちる。だが、(👕)そんなふたりの(🚝)関係(👇)が、順平の妻(qī(☔) )・光子の知ると(💃)ころとなり…。 Sorry but despite the fact that the 1931 version of this novel was the only western film to win an Academy Award for Best Picture it does not compare to the entertainment value of this version. True this is perhaps not the best adaptation of Ms. Ferber's novel, but then how many films are perfect adaptations of their source material. There are wonderful scenes missing from this adaptation, but then there are wonderful scenes missing from the adaptation of GWTW. No, I am not comparing this to a classic like GWTW. But the '31 version is not in the same class as GWTW either. This film should be taken for what it actually is, a good solid epic entertainment with spectacular scenes and good performances. Glenn Ford is perfect casting for Yancy. His performance is far superior to that of the overripe, stilted scenery chewing one delivered by Richard Dix in the original. Ford's boyish manner easily captures the charming immature nature of the character. Maria Schell is on a par with Irene Dunne. It is a pity her character was rewritten from the novel to be weaker than Ferber intended. This was obviously done to make the film Ford's but she's still gives a performance that is on the money. As so do the myriad supporting players in the film. Back in 1960, MGM obviously needed a big movie to move into the theaters that had been playing "Ben-Hur" for over a year. So this production was rushed to completion to fit the bill. The fact that it was shot in Cinemascope instead of a "Big" 70 mm process is evidence of this. It has been written that the production was shut down before the scripted ending could be filmed. This explains the rather abrupt and somewhat awkward end to the film. Perhaps a regular non "Roadshow" release might have fared better both with the critics and at the box-office. It often seems that those who praise the older version over this film have seldom actually seen the former. For many years the 1931 version was not available for viewing. During that period many film historians gushed in their praise of it. When it finally reappeared on screens most of them found it very creaky and revised their opinions but the older opinions are still in print, available and read. True, they didn't change their opinion of this version, but the older fell into proper perspective...Cinema History and rather dry history at that. While this version is not a classic it remains good entertainment. Compare it to "How The West Was Won" made by the same studio just a few years later.